stratuctural stability

...now browsing by tag

 
 

The importance of soil

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

The soil on your site is a critical aspect to your retaining wall project. Among the ways your soils can affect your overall project cost are:

  • Geogrid Requirements
  • Increased Effort to Compact
  • Cost of Importing Additional Material and Removing Existing Soils

A wall built in clay will have an increased need for geogrid when compared to the same wall build on a sandy site. This is because clay will “push” on the wall more than sand. This geogrid will be used to create a mass of soil large enough to overcome these forces.

Clays and silts resist compacting due to the shape of each grain of soil. They to trap water more and make proper compaction more labor intensive. It is important to achieve proper compaction to reduce future settlement and to increase the stability of the reinforced soil mass. To achieve the required compaction, you may need to compact more frequently with smaller lifts of soil, or use specialized compaction equipment.

When your site does not meet the minimum requirements suggested on the Working with Soils page on the Allan Block website, it may be required to remove the existing soil from the site and use select fill for the area within the geogrid. You may also find it necessary to increase the width of your base to compensate for poor soils under the wall.

If you have questionable soils on your site, please visit our website at allanblock.com for suggestions and recommendations. It will also be important that you contact a local engineer for help designing your retaining wall.

Tom

Structural Testing Provides Support for Cost Efficient Designs

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

As an engineer, I tend to be conservative. I need some proof before I will stray from the most conservative design possible. The problem with a conservative design however, is that it tends to make the cost of a project much higher. Any time a new product is introduced to the marketplace, the engineering community naturally chooses the side of structural stability over a less costly design, and it was no different when Allan Block introduced the AB Fence System.

AB Fence Testing

AB Fence Testing

Allan Block agreed that a very conservative design approach should be used until the system underwent very thorough testing. Even with the conservative designs, the AB Fence System was a more cost friendly product than competitive fencing systems, but the AB engineers knew that the system had vastly greater structural capabilities than were being assumed in the engineering community.

So they teamed up with the University of Calgary and with Stork/Twin City Testing to put the system through rigorous testing to show the kind of loading it was actually capable of handling. The structural component testing and full-system testing outperformed even the expectations of the engineers at Allan Block. The result? Now a typical AB Fence design, while still very structurally sound, is much more cost effective. This makes the AB Fence system by far the best option for sound abatement, security fencing, and other applications for anyone who wants a reliable and safe structure without spending a fortune. And as an engineer, I’m all for that!

Steve